The advantages of bridges are:
- increase the number of attached workstations and network segments.
- since bridges buffer frames, it is possible to interconnect different segments which use different MAC protocols.
- since bridges work at the MAC layer, they are transparent to higher level protocols.
- by subdividing the LAN into smaller segments, this increases overall reliability, and makes the network easier to maintain.
The disadvantages of bridges are
- the buffering of frames introduces network delays.
- bridges may overload during periods of high traffic.
- bridges which combine different MAC protocols require the frames to be modified before transmission onto the new segment. This causes delays.
Transparent bridges (also known as spanning tree IEEE 802.1D) make all routing decisions. The bridge is said to be transparent (invisible) to the workstations. The bridge will automatically initialize itself and configure its own routing information after it has been enabled.
Bridges are ideally used in environments where there a number of well defined workgroups, each operating more or less independent of each other, with occasional access to servers outside of their localized workgroup or network segment. Bridges do not offer performance improvements when used in diverse or scattered workgroups, where the majority of access occurs outside of the local segments.
The two separate network segments can be connected via a bridge. Note that each segment must have a unique network address number in order for the bridge to be able to forward packets from one segment to the other.
Ideally, if workstations on network segment A needed access to a server, the best place to locate that server is on the same segment as the workstations, as this minimizes traffic on the other segment and avoids the delay incurred by the bridge.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your feedback and comments are valuable for us: